Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Quality Over Quantity: Why I Disagree with Quotas in Politics

Leave a Comment
Alliance Party MP Naomi Long

Recently there has been some heated debate regarding the introduction of quotas for political parties in regards to the percentage of female candidates versus male candidates. Alliance Party MP Naomi Long voted against measures that would see the introduction of such quotas, and I for one support her policy on this. Quotas in politics are a dangerous thing, it is patronizing masquerading as equality, damning women who work hard at earning votes, respect and support to being selected in order to meet a quota and to tick a box. It would also disadvantage young men who are climbing through the ranks of political parties and who work equally as hard as those at the top by denying them a chance to hold public office, purely because they're men. Affirmative Action doesn't work, it is the Government 'enforcing' equality rather than engaging in social programs and initiatives in order to bring it about naturally.

There are those that might counter with the mention of the PSNI 's 50/50 scheme that enforced a 50% Catholic and 50% 'Other' workforce, however that was a necessarily evil due to the damaging legacy and horrors we inflicted upon one another during The Troubles. Only by enforcing this could we start to counter the negative attitudes towards policing within the Catholic and Nationalist communities, however it may have cost the PSNI the respect of more hard-line Loyalist and working class Protestant communities.


I believe that quotas would remove the accountability of political parties in regards to their policies on equality and the progression of women's rights, as they would be able to spout that they are progressive, when in reality their hand is being forced. What happens if an all female political party returns to the scene, similar to the Women's Coalition? Would they then have to make sure that 50% of their candidates are male and therefore undermine the very nature of their own political and social message?

I agree that quotas for women in executive level jobs in the private and public sector is a good thing, as it encourages a more balanced decision making, at least that's the impression that it gives, and I think it should be mandatory. However, politics is not an ordinary job, it is the means by which you are given a job to represent those who agree with what you say, what you think and what you do, not by what you sell, who you trade with or how cheap your goods are. 
Some of the brightest and most talented women in this country aren't politicians, and vice-versa. Just because there is a shortage of women in politics does not mean we need to introduce restrictive quotas that force political parties to pander to a political doctrine of false equality. More women, or more men, or more ethnic minorities, or LGBT members of the NI Assembly does not mean better politics. It doesn't matter what their gender is, what matters are their policies, what they say on the issues that matter and how they deal with them. 

I might seem a bit out of touch or retrogressive in saying what I am saying, however I feel that women, just like men, deserve the chance to be elected on their own merit and note demeaned and undermined by Government quotas. I would like to see more women in politics, but I want to see the right women in politics. Independent voices who can challenge the male dominated worlds of the public and private sector, women who can inspire younger women into making a difference and being an inspiration who won't be under the thumb of male dominated party executives. 

There is no guarantee that more women in politics would mean more progressive politics. All party's have lines their representatives must toe, usually laid down by men, and women will toe those lines, too. Of course I want to see more women and young people in politics, but forcing them to be in politics won't make things better. What if we had 50% men and 50% women? It wouldn't make a difference if party lines remained stagnant. We need to challenge societal attitudes to the role of women, why they are an important and integral part of how politics can move forward and then we will start to see a natural evolution of the political system.

We need to look past the gender of the candidate and start voting for who represents what we want to see in Northern Ireland. If you want marriage equality, vote for the parties that are fighting for it, if you want a better health system, vote for the parties who are going to bring that about, don't vote for a candidate based on whether they are a man or a woman, that just isn't smart politics. 
Read More...

Thursday, 23 February 2012

Marie Colvin - My Tribute to An Inspirational Woman

Leave a Comment

My heart broke yesterday at the news of Marie Colvin's untimely death in the Syrian city of Homs at the hands of Syrian Government forces. Marie embodied everything that journalism should strive to be, and ultimately it took her life. Never one to shy away from the bloodiest corners of the world, Marie stood up for what she believed in and died doing what every journalist should be doing every minute of every hour of every day: the right thing.

An inspiration to me and many of my colleagues, Marie was a symbol of a journalistic age long since gone, when those in her field were more than just observers; they were participants, they were the protectors of truth by risking their lives and demanded no thanks in return. Throughout the horrors she had witnessed in Chechnya, the mass murder in Sierra Leone, even risking her life to save 1,500 women and children in East Timor in the face of the Indonesian army and almost losing her sight when she was attacked by Sri Lankan forces during the civil war there, Marie never once relinquished in her fight for the truth. The world has truly lost a inspirational, courageous, passionate and dedicated woman, and we can only hope to remember her by keeping up the good fight and demanding respect for all human life.

"Never be afraid to do what's right...society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict upon our soul when we look the other way." - Martin Luther King Jr.
Read More...

Thursday, 2 February 2012

What's The Fracking Problem?

Leave a Comment
If you have been reading the news recently, more specifically the environment section, you may have come across the term 'Fracking', short for 'Hydraulic Fracturing' and the controversy surrounding it. Well what is it exactly? That's precisely what I'm going to be looking at, and why you really need to care about it.

In early 2011, Australian based, mineral mining giants, Tamboran Resources, were granted lisences to explore the possibility that shale gas deposits exist in the (bear with me on this one) Northwest Carbinoferous Basin (NCB). Now, to you and me that sounds like absolute gibberish, but the NCB covers a rather large section of Western Ireland, including a great swathe of south-west Fermanagh. 

Highlighted in orange is the NCB (click to enlarge)

Now what exactly is the NCB? Why does it matter? The geology of the NCB escapes me, however the unique makeup of the basin means that it could potentially harbour natural 'shale' gas, which companies such as Tamboran Resources are in the business of extracting through the process of 'fracking'. if you were to believe what Tamboran are telling the press in Northern Ireland, then fracking is the answer to all of our problems. Thousands of jobs will be created, NI will become an economic energy powerhouse, unparalleled in the UK, and that fracking is a harmless process.

Wrong. 

Hydraluc Fracturing, or 'fracking' as it is lovingly known, is the process of drilling hundreds of feet into shale rock, blasting 'fracking fluid' (a mixture of water, chemicals and sand compound) into the rock to release trapped shale gas which is vented to the surface and 'bottled' so to speak.
This video below gives a more precise definition:




Does this sound like a reasonable alternative energy source? Well if it still does, have a read at this:

"An independent geological report has found that it is "highly probable" a controversial technique to extract gas, known as fracking, triggered two minor earthquakes on the Lancashire coast earlier this year. The energy company Cuadrilla - which suspended its fracking test operations in June following the tremors - said the conditions that caused them are unlikely to occur again."
- Taken from BBC News, 2nd November 2011

"Recent earthquakes in Ohio and Oklahoma have been directly linked to deep wells used to dispose of liquid wastes for hydraulic fracturing or "fracking" of natural gas, according to geological experts. And they expect more earthquakes to come as the industry continues to expand across the eastern United States. "
Okay, so it causes earthquakes. What else does it do? (As if that wasn't bad enough)
Well fracking has also been linked to an increase in groundwater contamination, due to the nature of the chemicals used in fracking fluid, which in turn has led to an increase in cancers and serious, untreatable illnesses. It is a parallel, of sorts, to the 1996 scandal in Hinkley, California when Pacific Gas & Electric was found guilty of poisoning the local populace with hexavalent chromium (A virulent carcinogen), and paid out an estimated $333 million in damages. The entire incident was later immortalised on film as the 2000 Oscar winning Erin Brokovich.

Due to the 2005 Energy Act in the United States, companies that specialise in fracking are exempt from disclosing the chemical make up of fracking fluid, however in 2008 the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Endocrine Disruption Exchange (TEDX) analysed a sample of fracking fluid to find that 54 chemicals were used in the drilling process. This is what they found (click to enlarge):



Okay, so are you starting to understand what the problem is here? Earthquakes, poisoned groundwater, cancers, liver disease, bronchial illnesses, kidney failure, genetic mutations, birth defects, brain tumours, blindness, blood disease. This is all waiting for people living in Fermanagh. And who grants the lisences for fracking? Our very own Minister of Enterprise, Trade and Investment, Arlene Foster MLA and member of the DUP.

Arlene isn't telling us the whole story...

Protest groups have sprung up in Fermanagh, backed by a number of political parties. Mrs. Foster has faced criticisim over her alleged involvement with granting fracking licenses on land owned by her husband, 54 acres of it to be exact. The Minister herself however has hit back by claiming that lisences are awarded by a panel and that she has no direct involvement in awarding the licenses. Anybody else smell something rotten?

This issue has been painted in the press as a opportunity to create jobs, to reinvigorate the energy industry in Northern Ireland and in the Republic. But at the cost of what? Our health? Our tourism industry (on which Fermanagh heavily depends upon) or by costing jobs in the Green energy sector? Why can't Tamboran Resources invest in our already exisiting electricity grid and fund renewable energy sources that will last for as long as the machinery is maintained? Fracking wells see a rapid decline in gas production after the first few years of drilling, meaning that empty wells will be dotted around the Fermanagh countryside. A bit like this:


Is this what we want Fermanagh to look like? I don't think so. This has to stop now, for our own sake.


- Excerpt from MSNBC article, 6th January 2012

Fracking equipment in Pennsylvania
Read More...