Wednesday, 17 August 2011

I Predict A Riot

Leave a Comment

I'm sure you've read the countless blogs by pundits, journos and political affiliates all throwing their cards on the table about the recent civil unrest in Dear Old England. And I'm sure you've seen the looped footage of Reeves Furniture store in Croydon constantly burning down, over and over again on BBC News 24 and the constant back and forth between the Police and the Government.

But here's my take on it all.

Ok, so the story goes that 29 year old Mark Duggan of Tottenham, was shot and killed by the Metropolitan Police after a shootout. Duggan was supposedly to be arrested for narcotics possession as part of Operation Trident. Now as the details of his death are still being investigated and to avoid embarrassing myself by jumping to conclusions, I'm not going to make any further comment on Mark Duggan's death.

What happened next has never before been seen on such a scale outside of say the 1995 Brixton Riots or the August 1969 riots across Northern Ireland. Rioting, looting, murder, arson on a massive scale exploded across London, stretching from Enfield to Orpington. The violence then 'spread' to Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool, Nottingham, Bristol and Wolverhampton. The rest you all know.

But what happens now? With the riots being pegged by many during the unrest as the 'imminent collapse of society' it certainly appeared that way with Sky News and BBC News 24 providing 'rolling' coverage of the violence, updates from Twitter and a live feed from the air of burning houses, shops and cars. We watched as riot police pathetically tried to contain the violence with the pitiful array of underwhelming tactics such as charging the rioters and deflecting missiles, bottles and bricks. Coming from Belfast, it was very apparent that the closest 99% of the Police officers had come to rioting was football hooliganism.


They looked frightened, unprepared and vulnerable in the shiny riot gear, it looked brand new and never before used, and probably wasn't. What had appeared in the past to have been a relatively Northern Irish problem had made its way onto the high streets of some of the largest cities in England for the first time.
I commend the actions of the Police in trying to tackle the rioting, for unlike their PSNI counterparts who expect riot season between July and August every summer, the Greater Manchester Police and the Met had no clue that this was coming. This wasn't violence fuelled by sectarian divisions or ethnic tension or political upheaval, this was an explosion of violent opportunism and frustration.
While many on the left have been quick to criticise the public sector cuts, the rising levels of unemployment and the upward surge of immigration as being the root causes of the violence, which might be true in some respects. But this does not explain the looting. Not at all.

People loot a store in Hackney

With levels of poverty rising in larger cities in the UK and the gap between the working class and the upper class increasing, the middle class is beginning to vanish completely. This has pushed people, rather aggressively, to the fringes of what they can tolerate. Benefits are being cut, education and health are having their guts ripped out and the private sector is haemorrhaging unemployment figures like never before.

How can a single mother with children to feed, rent to pay and schools to pay for relate to a Prime Minister who has never had to choose between going to bed hungry or keeping the lights on? How can we expect youth who have no hope of achieving a job on minimum wage to have respect for MPs who don't have to worry about whether or not they can afford the bus to the jobcentre or how to pay for a University degree that has now been reserved for the super-rich?

Ignorance is bliss: The Prime Minister, David Cameron

While I do not condone riotous behaviour of any kind, I can understand frustration at circumstances spilling into an expression of anger and violence towards those who uphold and maintain the status quo. But again that does not explain the looting. The looting and the destruction of property, both public and private amounts to nothing more than mass opportunism and was the most visible expression of the 'Me First' culture that had been fostered by the Labour government beforehand, by introducing a plethora of social reforms which removed moral boundaries and allowed for people to push the limits of what was allowed. The only problem was, nobody bit back and the boundaries kept being pushed.

However, as a youth worker, I refute the accusations that what we have seen on the news is indicative of 100% of the youth across the UK. I know for a fact that, as a young person myself, 99% of the young people I work for respect the rule of law, respect the values and property of others and that it is morally wrong to just take what they want without earning it.

Those we have seen on the streets represent the visible minority of youth that resort to violence, and I will not allow the generation I belong to and that of the youth I work for to be demonised by the Old Guard of the Tories or by the grey haired, right wing rhetoric of the Daily Mail's key demographic. We all know that reactionary sensationalism sells papers and fuels ignorant, biased blogs, but I challenge those that would have the youth of today locked away or put in the army or 'cracked down upon' work with them for a year, hear their stories, understand their frustrations and empathise with their circumstances before writing them off as anything other than the future of the country.


Because that's exactly what they are. The future. The young people of today are going to be the council workers, teachers, doctors, dentists, care workers, youth workers, community workers, police officers, ambulance drivers, mechanics, joiners, civil servants and bus drivers of tomorrow. We will all rely on these young people to man our electrical stations, maintain our roads, police our communities, look after the country. If we codemn an entire section of society because of the actions of a few, we do ourselves an injustice as a free, fair and developed democracry. There are those that would have the rioters lose all of their benefits, their jobs and their homes. Brilliant.

Not only do we have an incredibly mobilised and aggressive minority, but we then condemn them to the streets where they will have nothing to lose. Now is not the time to fail them even further, I for one support a programme wherein we employ those convicted to rebuild the communities they have damaged, for minimum wage. They would learn the values of teamwork, how to respect authority, and learn valuable practical skills that will prepare them for a post-recession Britain (hopefully.) If they don't co-operate with these programmes, only then should we look at harsher punishments.


Now is not the time to fail the young people of Britain, now is not the time to condemn them all as violent, thuggish criminals, this is the time in which we need to intervene, educate them on the benefits of societal participation (and not in a classroom) and if needs be, give them the responsibility to help themselves. It is a known fact amongst those in the youth work profession that young people who are given responsibility are imbued with a new energy for life, a more positive outlook on it and learn to appreciate and respect the authority that gives them that responsibility. None of this translates as state induced homelessness or lengthy spells in prison. We have a real chance as a society to appreciate the lessons this episode has taught us and take this as an opportunity to tackle the issues at hand, for good.
Read More...

Friday, 5 August 2011

The Hangman Comes Around...

Leave a Comment

So, despite the fact that we are in the year of our lord 2011, that man has indeed walked on the Moon and that beating your kids is no longer an appropriate form of punishment, the UK is facing the question: Death Penalty or No Death Penalty?


Yes, it appears that the rabble rousers amongts us decent, common sense loving folk have jumped on the Government's e-petition website to push for a House of Commons vote on capital punishment. While a number of 100,000 signatures is needed for a vote, the issue is not whether or not it will be reinstated (that will never, ever happen, regardless) but that there are so many supposedly in favour of it.

In favour of state vengeance: DUP's Jeffrey Donaldson MP

DUP MP Jeffrey Donaldson has come out and publicly stated that he and his colleagues in Westminster would openly back calls for the death penalty to be dealt in cases of terrorism. So we all know who they're eyeing up when it comes to who they want in front of the firing squad... But for a party who silently allows the condemnation of the gay community and in the same breath calls for the hanging of convicted 'terrorists', it's hard to see anything in the way of credibility.

In a conversation I had just last night with David Vance of the TUV, former Assembly election candidate for Upper Bann, he told me that he personally would welcome a campaign to reinstate the death penalty but did not think it would ever come to fruition. Those that manage to get any such a petition brought before the House of Commons would find it hard getting a majority of MPs to back it, and even if they did, I can imagine that it would be overturned after the first execution.
People are weak stomached when it comes to carrying the courage of their convictions in things like these. Just look at the wars in the Middle East; everyone wanted us to invade and conquer, until a British soldier came home in a coffin.

I can understand people's points of view on capital punishment when it comes to things such as child murder, sexual assault, terrorism, murder of police officers, I for one completely understand the human need for revenge, retribution and blood.

Of course the families of those that have lost loved ones in atrocities such as 9/11, the Omagh bombing, or the horrific slaughter of innocent people in Norway by Anders Breivik, would be the first to want vengeance and justice done for those that have been taken from them in such a manner. Who wouldn't? Like I said, it is only human nature. But why would we then we insist on killing people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?
It's not the answer. I'm a great believer in compassion and forgiveness, I'm not a God fearing man but that is what most religions preach, isn't it? For even in the Bible itself, God has commanded us 'Thou shalt not kill.'

The Omagh bombing took the lives of 29 people in 1998

As citizens of a developed, leading Western nation, can we really afford to join an ever shrinking global club that includes Belarus, the PR China, North Korea, Iran, Libya, Syria and Somalia? All single party states, all totalitarian societies, all isolated and introverted Government systems that have horrendous civil rights records, with many openly executing Christians and Homosexuals alike. So are they really the nations we want to be rubbing shoulders with?

States in red & orange  currently practise capital punishment

If we introduce the death penalty then we will have absolutely NO right to condemn states that practise the murder of their own people (ie: Libya) and in the same breath, hand out death to those we deem deserving of it. It is not our place as 'leaders' of a free world to sit on an ivory tower and set an example to the rest of the world if we take a step back by nearly 50 years. Why not revoke women's rights as well? Why not ship immigrants back home? Why not lock up all the gays?  Because the people that want to 'bring back hanging' would love it that way.


Bonfire of the liberties

The only post-USSR state to have the death penalty is Belarus, considered the last great dictatorship in Europe, not even Mother Russia will entertain the idea of it anymore. The point is that if we harken back the old days of capital punishment, we risk being seen as a pariah state by the world at large. Yes, many of you will argue that the USA still retains the death penalty for extreme crimes in 36 out of 50 states, however let's look at the costs to the taxpayer of maintaining capital punishment:

In California alone, a state of some 37 million people, the death penalty costs $114 million per year to the state and the taxpayer to maintain. This figure would also be made larger by appeals, the radical overhaul of the justice system, the establishment of a new legal code, bigger investment into over analysing cases deemed to meet the criteria for capital punishment and the loss of the UK's place as a respectable, just and civilised nation. Those calling for it fail to specify for exactly whom would be eligible for the hangman's noose, what would constitute terrorism, how to prove guilt without reasonable doubt and exactly how far we can go in determining who deserves to die.



Death row: an expensive industry

I believe it is not our right as a State or as people to determine who's life should end and how, that makes us no better than those who are committing the crimes we would see them hung for. The UK's violent crime rate is rising, but the introduction of execution as a deterrent will not make the madmen go away overnight. It could even drive the amount of violent crime upwards. Pakistan, a country with capital punishment, is currently considered the second most dangerous country to live in, the US has a homicide rate much higher than that of it's abolitionist neighbour Canada and Iran has a track record of cracking down hard on those who speak out against the state. 



The Taliban: Another organisation in favour of the death penalty...

Where would we draw the line on how many of our rights would be taken away? What would constitute terrorism? Hacking a Government website? Owning a Koran? These are serious questions that need to be asked before the UK starts on a downward spiral that we may never find ourselves getting out of.
The number of signatories against the death penalty in the UK is almost double the number that want to 'bring back hanging', almost all of whom sit on the elitist, middle class, right wing demographic that fits neatly into 'Old Guard' Tory voters or the cuddly, friendly arms of the BNP's Nick Griffin.





Read More...